Common Errors in Cost/Benefit Justifications of the Coronavirus Lockdowns
![The Bob Murphy Show](https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_650w/s3/static-page/img/BobMurphyPodcast_750x516.png.webp?itok=-9m94GOI 650w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_870w/s3/static-page/img/BobMurphyPodcast_750x516.png.webp?itok=221PKXr7 870w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1090w/s3/static-page/img/BobMurphyPodcast_750x516.png.webp?itok=VgAOg5HR 1090w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1310w/s3/static-page/img/BobMurphyPodcast_750x516.png.webp?itok=8b57pbMY 1310w,https://cdn.mises.org/styles/responsive_4_3_1530w/s3/static-page/img/BobMurphyPodcast_750x516.png.webp?itok=qnFaY_Of 1530w)
Bob explains some of the basic–but crucial–errors in the cost/benefit analyses that have been offered by economists to justify the political lockdowns issued in light of the coronavirus. Specifically, economists have conflated voluntary physical distancing with coerced lockdowns, and they are also misusing the concept of a Value of a Statistical Life (VSL).
For more information, see BobMurphyShow.com. The Bob Murphy Show is also available on iTunes, Stitcher, Spotify, and via RSS.