Mises Wire

Pre-Colonial Igbo Diplomacy: Challenging the Myth of Diplomatic Absence

Igbo

The assertion that pre-colonial Africans had no concept of diplomacy is both misleading and ahistorical. Among the Igbo-speaking people of southeastern Nigeria, a rich tradition of diplomacy flourished long before colonial incursions disrupted their political, economic, and social systems. The Igbos practiced intricate and effective diplomatic strategies rooted in pragmatism, negotiation, and cultural values, ensuring peaceful coexistence and mutual prosperity with neighboring groups. Drawing on scholarly works, this article demonstrates how the Igbo-speaking people engaged in sophisticated diplomatic practices during the pre-colonial era.

Diplomacy as a Cornerstone of Igbo Society

Pre-colonial Igbo diplomacy was an adaptive mechanism for maintaining stability and fostering collaboration in a politically-fragmented landscape. Unlike centralized kingdoms, such as the Oyo or Benin empires, Igbo society was highly decentralized, consisting of autonomous communities governed by assemblies of elders, titled men, and other stakeholders. Despite this apparent lack of centralized authority, the Igbos developed a web of diplomatic relations that facilitated trade, resolved conflicts, and secured alliances.

Patrick Chukwudike and Esin Eminue argue that diplomacy among the Igbo was driven by a pragmatic need to manage inter-communal relations. Mechanisms such as emissaries, marriage alliances, and conflict arbitration were instrumental in maintaining peace and fostering cooperation. For instance, emissaries were dispatched to negotiate treaties, deliver messages, and mediate disputes, often leveraging shared cultural practices and linguistic affinities to build trust.

Trade as a Diplomatic Channel

Diplomacy was also promoted through the avenue of trade in pre-colonial Igboland. According to Daniel Chukwuma Nzereogu’s work on the Nnewi example, trade networks served as conduits for establishing and maintaining diplomatic ties. Nnewi—a prominent trading hub—exemplified the interplay between commerce and diplomacy. Trade agreements were often accompanied by negotiations that addressed broader issues such as territorial boundaries, mutual security, and cultural exchange.

Nzereogu highlights how markets became neutral spaces where traders from diverse communities interacted, fostering interdependence, and reducing the likelihood of conflict. These interactions were regulated by customary laws and agreements that ensured fairness and protected traders. By embedding diplomacy within economic activities, the Igbos created a framework for enduring relationships that transcended ethnic and linguistic barriers.

Oracle Diplomacy: Harnessing Spiritual Authority

Similarly, religion played a pivotal role in Igbo diplomatic practices by using oracles. Francis C. Odeke and Ikechukwu O. Onuaha’s exploration of oracle diplomacy underscores its significance as a conflict resolution tool. Oracles such as the Arochukwu Long Juju wielded immense spiritual authority and were often approached by disputing parties seeking impartial judgments.

Oracle consultations served both practical and symbolic purposes. Practically, they provided a mechanism for resolving disputes without resorting to violence. Symbolically, they reinforced shared spiritual values and underscored the interconnectedness of Igbo communities. The decisions of oracles were binding, as defiance could result in spiritual or social sanctions. This reliance on spiritual arbitration illustrates the fusion of religion and diplomacy in Igbo society.

Marriage Alliances and Cultural Diplomacy

Marriage alliances were another cornerstone of Igbo diplomacy. Intermarriage between communities served as a strategic tool for cementing alliances and ensuring peaceful relations. By intertwining familial ties with political agreements, the Igbos created a network of mutual obligations that discouraged hostilities and encouraged cooperation.

Francis C. Odeke’s analysis of pre-colonial Igbo diplomacy emphasizes the importance of cultural exchange in fostering diplomatic ties. Marriage alliances were not merely transactional; they facilitated the exchange of cultural practices, beliefs, and values, creating a shared sense of identity among otherwise distinct communities. This cultural diplomacy complemented other forms of negotiation, enhancing the resilience of Igbo diplomatic practices.

Inter-Ethnic Diplomacy: The Igbo-Ibibio Case

Uwem Jonah Akpan’s study of Ibibio-Igbo diplomatic relations provides a compelling example of inter-ethnic diplomacy. Despite occasional conflicts, the Igbos and Ibibios maintained a largely cooperative relationship characterized by trade, cultural exchange, and mutual defense pacts. Akpan highlights how both groups navigated their differences through dialogue and negotiation, demonstrating the adaptability of Igbo diplomacy in multi-ethnic contexts.

The use of intermediaries and emissaries was particularly notable in Igbo-Ibibio relations. These figures facilitated communication and helped bridge linguistic and cultural divides. By prioritizing dialogue over confrontation, the Igbos exemplified the principles of effective diplomacy in a diverse and dynamic environment.

Benefits of Pre-Colonial Igbo Diplomacy

The benefits of pre-colonial Igbo diplomacy were manifold. First, it ensured relative stability in a politically-fragmented region. By emphasizing negotiation and compromise, the Igbos minimized the frequency and intensity of conflicts, creating an environment conducive to economic and social development. Second, diplomacy facilitated the growth of trade networks, which enhanced the prosperity of Igbo communities and their neighbors. Third, it fostered cultural exchange and mutual understanding, laying the groundwork for enduring relationships.

Further, Chukwudike and Eminue’s work highlights how diplomatic practices contributed to the resilience of Igbo society in the face of external challenges. By leveraging their diplomatic acumen, the Igbos navigated complex inter-communal dynamics and maintained their autonomy until the advent of colonial rule.

Reframing African Diplomacy

The misconception that pre-colonial Africans lacked diplomatic traditions stems from a bias that equates diplomacy with state-centric, bureaucratic practices. This narrow perspective ignores the diverse and innovative ways in which non-centralized societies like the Igbos managed their affairs. The Igbo example challenges this bias, demonstrating that diplomacy can thrive in decentralized systems and that its effectiveness is not contingent on the presence of a centralized state apparatus.

The analyses in this article underscore the rationality and intentionality of Igbo diplomatic practices. Far from being arbitrary or primitive, these practices were grounded in a deep understanding of human relationships and the importance of balance and reciprocity. By recognizing the value of pre-colonial African diplomacy, scholars can enrich their understanding of global diplomatic traditions and challenge the hegemony of Western-centric narratives.

Conclusion

The Igbo-speaking people of southeastern Nigeria exemplify the sophistication and efficacy of pre-colonial African diplomacy. Through trade, oracle consultations, marriage alliances, and inter-ethnic negotiations, the Igbos developed a dynamic and adaptive diplomatic system that ensured stability, fostered prosperity, and promoted cultural exchange. By examining the works of scholars such as Chukwudike, Eminue, Odeke, Nzereogu, and Akpan, we can appreciate the depth and complexity of Igbo diplomatic traditions and dispel the myth of African diplomatic absence. The legacy of Igbo diplomacy serves as a testament to the ingenuity and resilience of pre-colonial African societies and invites a reevaluation of the broader narratives surrounding African history and diplomacy.

image/svg+xml
Image Source: Adobe Stock
Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.
What is the Mises Institute?

The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard. 

Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.

Become a Member
Mises Institute