Pennsylvania's Lockdown Rules Were Arbitrary, Inconsistent, and Political

Pennsylvania’s Lockdown Rules Were Arbitrary, Inconsistent, and Political

Tags: Political Theory, Bureaucracy and Regulation, Cronyism and Corporatism

02/04/2021 Georg Grassmueck

Surprise! An audit of Pennsylvania’s covid lockdowns reveals the process lacked any legal consistency or transparency. Yet Pennsylvania’s health bureaucrats have used these arbitrary rules to crush the state’s entrepreneurs.

Original Article: “Pennsylvania’s Lockdown Rules Were Arbitrary, Inconsistent, and Political“

This Audio Mises Wire is generously sponsored by Christopher Condon. Narrated by Michael Stack.

The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard.

Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.