Money and Banking

Displaying 1881 - 1890 of 1985
Murray N. Rothbard

The press is resounding with acclaim for the accession to Power of Alan Greenspan as chairman of the Fed; economists from right, left, and center weigh in with hosannas for Alan's greatness, acumen, and unparalleled insights into the "numbers." The only reservation seems to be that Alan might not enjoy the enormous power and reverence accorded to his predecessor, for he does not have the height of a basketball player, is not bald, and does not smoke imposing cigars. 

The astute observer might feel that anyone accorded such unanimous applause from the Establishment couldn't be all good, and in this case he would be right on the mark. I knew Alan thirty years ago, and have followed his career with interest ever since. 

Murray N. Rothbard

Mises demonstrated, as early as 1912, that no good can become a medium of exchange, much less a money, unless it has a previous non-monetary usefulness on the market. In short, money can only emerge as a commodity on the market, and cannot be imposed by the government, by social contract, or by various schemes of economists or other observers. Such plans have elsewhere been labeled correctly by Hayek himself as "constructivist." In short, media of exchange and therefore money can only arise "organically" out of market processes and cannot be imposed by outside schemers.

Murray N. Rothbard

In the last few months, the Reagan administration seems to have achieved the culmination of its "economic miracle" of the last several years: while the money supply has skyrocketed upward in double digits, the consumer price index has remained virtually flat. Money cheap and abundant, stock and bond markets booming, and yet prices remaining stable: what could be better than that? Has the President, by inducing Americans to feel good and stand tall, really managed to repeal economic law? Has soft soap been able to erase the need for "root-canal" economics?