Philosophy and Methodology

In his “A Groundwork for Rights: Man’s Natural End,” Douglas Rasmussen takes issue with a paper I presented at the Fifth Annual L

In describing Adam Smith’s acknowledgments as “neo-plagiarism” (Rashid, 1990), was trying to characterize a situation where a sch

Robbins contributed the most definitive modern definition of the discipline, one which is now widely accepted. Although limited by his overly restrictive assumptions on information, 

In this article, David Gordon and Roberta A. Modugno review of J.C.

In this paper, I take up the long-overdue task of constructing the foundation for an a priori theory of international relations.

There are two views of monopoly within what might be called the broad Austrian camp.

Over the span of one hundred and fifty years, dissatisfaction with one or more of the fundamental postulates of theoretical economics has given imp

Politics asks “What is to be done?” and proposes a profusion of answers.

Amartya Sen's wide-ranging book grasps a point ignored by many economists.  Economists are generally alive to the virtues of markets, and few since the collapse of communism have a good word to say about central planning.

How rational are humans? Many important implications hinge on this seemingly innocuous question hinge, for not only economists, but all social scientists.