Value and Exchange

Due to the productivity norm doctrine, writes Phillip Bagus, labor unions disturb the process of capital accumulation.

Concerns over safety and pollution are merely protectionist tactics to keep out imports from Mexico, writes Gary Galles.

Anti-outsourcing theories implicitly assume that high production costs are a source of wealth, argues Bill Anderson.

Presented at the Mises Institute’s first conference, November 16-17, 1983; in Washington, DC.

William Anderson examines the common myths of the gas price increase, and then turns to the question of why prices are as high as they are.

The new protectionists, writes Sudha Shenoy, want to reverse the outflow of US capital to China and India. But it cannot be done, which is good in the long run for everyone.

Ryan Ford says he is glad to do the work others are unwilling to do at the going market wage. When one looks at the grocery workers who are striking for higher pay, their tactics and principles, he asks: is this consistent with freedom? Is this what free and fair trade is? To use coercion to force others to trade under your conditions is folly.

Microeconomics starts with the basic fact that each person has short term and long term goals, like buying a ham sandwich and graduating from college. People act in the world to accomplish something. Human action is purposive. You employ different means to achieve certain goals.

Recorded at Mises University 2001.

The Chinese "yellow peril" was the late nineteenth century menace. And today, write Cecil Bohanon and T.N. Van Cott, the menace is outsourcing. The Chinese and Indians are selling Americans things like computer software at bargain basement prices. But there is nothing special about outsourcing software technology. All that matters is whether the Chinese and Indians sell for less than what current American software producers could earn in their next most lucrative employment. If so, outsourcing enhances U.S. living standards.