Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

Monetary Reform from a Comparative-Theoretical Perspective

The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Downloads

 

Volume 7, No. 3 (Fall 2004)

 

Comparative analysis, however, could reveal some broader principles by which reform proposals may be evaluated. This exercise might prove to be more valuable than arguments over which theoretical perspective is the correct one. We attempt just such an exercise in this paper. Beginning from a broad definition of “monetarism” coined by Yeager (1997), we categorize various monetary cycle theories according to a common framework, and then use the framework to identify essential components of the Austrian view and assess the macro-economic outcomes they imply under a well-known reform proposal: the free banking system of Selgin (1988, 1997) and Selgin and White (1987, 1994). We find that there is general compatibility between free banking and Austrian thought, so that the efficacy of such a reform does not depend crucially on peculiar assumptions about the nature of macro instability.

CITE THIS ARTICLE

Carilli, Anthony M., and Gregory M. Dempster, and J. Rory Rohan. “Monetary Reform from a Comparative-Theoretical Perspective.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 7, No.3 (Fall 2004): 29–44.

All Rights Reserved ©
What is the Mises Institute?

The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard. 

Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.

Become a Member
Mises Institute