Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

On the Ethics of Fair Value Accounting: Distributive Effects, Distributive Injustice, and Implications for Social Peace

Abstract design
Downloads

Fair value accounting is at the heart of arguably the world’s most prominent accounting standards, particularly US GAAP and IFRS. Fair value measurement has been the subject of intense debate. Among other things, it has been analyzed from an ethical perspective. However, this discussion has mainly been limited to the judgment involved in fair value measurement and the ethics of fair value in its ability to provide decision-useful information to interested parties. This study pushes the boundaries by adding a new dimension to the discussion of the ethics of fair value accounting by examining its ethics from a more systemic and societal perspective. Drawing on Austrian business cycle theory, it argues that fair value accounting facilitates certain distributive effects in inflationary monetary environments, thereby contributing to distributive injustice and potentially to social discord. In this respect, fair value accounting—in contrast to historical cost accounting—should not be considered fair or just, but unethical instead.

CITE THIS ARTICLE

Rapp, David J., Jeffrey M. Herbener, and David Gordon. 2024. “On the Ethics of Fair Value Accounting: Distributive Effects, Distributive Injustice, and Implications for Social Peace.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.35297/001c.117210.

image/svg+xml
Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.