The Real Reason for FDR’s Popularity
What if a president took a different direction and sought popularity by expanding rather than reducing liberty?
What if a president took a different direction and sought popularity by expanding rather than reducing liberty?
What if a president took a different direction and sought popularity by expanding rather than reducing liberty? There is a model here they could follow, but it is not one you have thought of. It is Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Recorded at the Ludwig von Mises Institute; Auburn, Alabama; 9 October 2010.
Many elected officials are already wealthy by most people's standards. What makes the wealthy and otherwise successful want to hold office? Is it an overweening ego and an insatiable hunger for public adulation?
The government creates "jobs" that are destructive. Because there is no feedback of profit and loss, the only thing that can eventually end a harmful bureaucracy is a massive public outcry.
Coke's legal-economic philosophy might be summed up in a phrase he used in Parliament in 1621: "That no Commodity can be banished, but by Act of Parliament."
Carried through consistently, the right of property would entitle the proprietor to all the advantages that the good’s employment may generat
it is only when great and good men are at the head of a nation that the people can expect to succeed in forming such barriers to counteract recent encroachments on their rights; and whenever a nation is so supine as to suffer such an opportunity to be lost, they will soon feel that the danger was not over.