More Money Creation Won’t Create More Economic Growth
Contrary to the popular way of thinking, setting in motion a consumption unbacked by production through monetary pumping will only stifle economic growth.
Contrary to the popular way of thinking, setting in motion a consumption unbacked by production through monetary pumping will only stifle economic growth.
Can policy-induced deviations from the natural rate of interest increase roundaboutness in production? Mark Gertsen studies 28 developed economies using an ARDL model, and finds Austrian boom-bust dynamics.
The Understanding Money Mechanics series by Robert P. Murphy, is a comprehensive overview of the theory, history, and practice of money and banking, with a focus on the United States.
Tomáš Frömmel contends that a negative inflation target combined with the Taylor Rule can be a non-distortionary monetary policy consistent with Austrian business cycle theory.
Presented at the Mises Institute's "First Annual Advanced Instructional Conference in Austrian Economics" at Stanford University.
Central bankers want to find a means of resetting everything, exploring solutions such as digitising currency through blockchains, doing away with cash, and finding other avenues to try to control the so-called vagaries of free markets.
Why does this domino process affect only banks, and not real estate, publishing, oil, or any other industry that may get into trouble?
Central banks can only distort and mask real interest rates with monetary policy. Interest rates are really set by each individual's time preference.
The true lesson from Japan is that central planners prefer to gradually nationalize the economy before even considering a moderate reduction in government size and control.
Suppose that a convincing orator should go on TV tomorrow, and urge the public: "The banking system of this country is insolvent."